14.1 C
London
Tuesday, September 22, 2026

Africa’s Water Reuse Challenge: Why Scaling Matters More Than Technology

Chetan Mistry, Strategy and Marketing Director WSS Growth Markets at Xylem, shares his perspective on Africa’s water-reuse challenge, explaining why the continent’s biggest hurdle is not a lack of technology, but the ability to integrate, finance and scale proven solutions into mainstream water infrastructure.

EVENTS SPOTLIGHT


Africa’s water reuse ambitions are entering an important phase.

 

Across the continent, governments, municipalities, industries and water utilities are increasingly looking at treated wastewater not simply as a waste stream, but as a potential source of water for a range of applications.

Yet the central challenge is no longer whether the technology exists.

According to Chetan Mistry, Regional Strategy and Marketing Director, Xylem Water Solutions and Services (WSS), most of the technologies required to recycle and reuse water are already commercially available and proven.

Xylem logowater reuse

The bigger challenge is taking successful projects and integrating them into larger, economically viable water systems.

“While adoption is increasing, many experts believe it is not yet scaling quickly enough to address Africa’s growing water security challenges,” Mistry says.

That distinction is important. Africa does not need to wait for a technological breakthrough before expanding water reuse. What it needs is a framework that allows reuse projects to move beyond isolated pilots and become part of mainstream water planning.

From pilot projects to mainstream infrastructure

Water reuse projects can demonstrate that a technical solution works. But proving technical feasibility is only the first step.

Mistry identifies integration as one of the biggest barriers to wider adoption. A pilot project can operate in relative isolation and with limited financial pressure.

A large-scale system, however, has to fit into existing infrastructure, meet regulatory requirements, deliver consistent water quality and make economic sense over its operating life.

“The issue comes back to integration,” he says. “Does the technology suit the reuse use case and economics, and can it scale to keep matching those requirements?”

This becomes particularly important because there is no single definition of “reused water.” The quality required depends on what the water will ultimately be used for.

Water destined for human consumption can require multiple treatment stages, potentially including clarification, filtration, membrane technologies and disinfection.

Chetan Mistry - Xylem Water Solutions and Services
The issue comes back to integration. Does the technology suit the reuse use case and economics, and can it scale to keep matching those requirements?
Chetan Mistry
Regional Strategy and Marketing Director,
Xylem Water Solutions and Services (WSS)

 

Water intended for irrigation, cooling, cleaning or industrial processes may require a different treatment configuration.

The implication for African water infrastructure is that reuse cannot be approached as a standardised technology purchase. Systems need to be designed around the intended application, available water source, required quality, volumes and economics.

Water reuse has no single winning sector

Agriculture is an obvious candidate for greater water reuse because of the enormous volumes of water it consumes. But Mistry argues that focusing too heavily on identifying a single sector with the “greatest potential” risks missing the broader opportunity.

Mining, municipalities and industry all have different water requirements and different reasons to pursue reuse.

For mines, for example, even relatively small changes in water availability can have major consequences for production. Industrial users may need reliable process water during periods of peak demand, while municipalities face the combined pressures of population growth and urbanisation.

The result is a water-reuse opportunity that extends across the economy.
“I think talking about ‘greatest potential’ is the wrong perspective,” Mistry says. “Water reuse should be considered across all applications where it is technically, economically and operationally viable.”

That approach also changes how water infrastructure is viewed. Instead of treating reuse as a specialist solution for areas experiencing extreme scarcity, it becomes one component of a broader water-security strategy.

Pumping is part of the equation

Water reuse discussions often focus heavily on treatment technologies, particularly membranes, filtration and disinfection. But once water has been treated, it still has to be moved efficiently through a system.

Pumping therefore becomes a critical component of the overall economics.“If a site uses the wrong pumps or pump systems, it ends up wasting energy and causing issues such as pipeline damage and increased maintenance,” Mistry explains.

Correct pump sizing can help reduce unnecessary energy consumption, while modern systems incorporating variable-speed drives, optimised impellers and smart controllers can further improve efficiency.

This matters because the operating cost of a water-reuse system extends far beyond the initial treatment plant investment.

Energy consumption, maintenance, equipment reliability and system performance all contribute to the lifetime cost.

A water-reuse project that saves freshwater but requires excessive energy or suffers from frequent equipment failures may struggle to deliver its full economic value.The objective, therefore, should be to optimise the entire water cycle rather than one individual piece of equipment.

Digitalisation connects the water cycle

This is where digital technology becomes increasingly important.
Sensors, monitoring systems, automation and data analytics can provide operators with continuous visibility into the condition and performance of water infrastructure.

For reuse systems, that visibility can be particularly valuable because water quality, pressure, equipment condition, energy use and other operating parameters need to be monitored consistently.

“Digitalisation ultimately gives operators the greater confidence to scale water reuse because they can continuously monitor water quality, system performance and compliance,” Mistry says.

Digital tools can also help identify leaks, maintain appropriate pressure, monitor equipment condition and improve operational decision-making.

The value is therefore not simply about collecting more data. It is about using that data to operate infrastructure more efficiently and reliably.

Mistry points to the potential for digital systems to support everything from predictive maintenance and chemical dosing to pump control and pressure management.

For African utilities and industries facing constrained resources, these capabilities could become increasingly important as water-reuse infrastructure grows more sophisticated.

WHERE CAN WATER REUSE SCALE?
Across the economy
Agriculture
Irrigation demand
Mining
Operational water security
Municipalities
Urban water supply
Industry
Process and cooling water

Energy efficiency will shape the economics

As treatment systems become more advanced, energy efficiency becomes inseparable from the water-reuse discussion.

Pumps are an obvious area for improvement, but they are not the only one. Mistry points to aeration systems as an important energy consumer in treatment processes, with more efficient systems offering opportunities to reduce operating requirements.

Digital monitoring can provide another layer of optimisation by helping operators manage equipment and processes according to actual operating conditions.
This points towards a broader principle: water reuse should not simply recover water. It should seek to recover value.

That value can come through reduced freshwater demand, lower energy consumption, improved operational efficiency and, in some applications, recovery of resources from wastewater streams.

Mistry highlights opportunities such as nutrient recovery and biogas generation as examples of how wastewater can become a source of additional value.

The concept moves water infrastructure closer to a circular model in which wastewater is no longer viewed solely as something that must be treated and discharged.Lesotho’s R2.4bn Senqu Bridge Opens

Making reuse part of water security

For water reuse to scale, however, technology and operational efficiency will not be enough.
Investment, regulation and public confidence will also determine how quickly projects move from demonstration to mainstream infrastructure.

Mistry argues that water reuse needs to be treated as part of the overall water-security picture rather than positioned as an alternative or secondary solution.

“If we treat water reuse as separate, it becomes harder to evaluate alongside other water supply options when planning long-term infrastructure investment.,” he says.
That is fundamentally a planning issue.

If reuse is incorporated into long-term water-resource planning alongside surface water, groundwater and other sources, it can be evaluated as part of the same infrastructure strategy rather than as an isolated sustainability initiative.

Governments also have an important role in creating the stability required for investment. Regulation establishes expectations around water quality, pricing, risk and allocation, while policy can influence investment incentives and collaboration.

Public confidence is equally important, particularly when reused water is destined for higher-value applications.

“There is a prevailing stigma about recycled water,” Mistry says, arguing that greater public understanding of safety and cost will be necessary for societies to become more comfortable with reuse.

Africa already has examples to build on

The continent is not starting from zero.Mistry points to examples in South Africa, including reuse systems in Cape Town and eThekwini, while several other African markets are also expanding their focus on water reuse. A standout example is Namibia.

Windhoek remains one of the world’s most recognised potable reuse examples, demonstrating how reuse can become part of mainstream water supply planning.

The significance of these examples goes beyond the technology itself.
“What these examples have in common is that they stopped treating reuse as an emergency measure and started planning for it as part of mainstream water supply,” Mistry says.

That may ultimately be the most important lesson for other African markets.

From use-and-discharge to a circular water economy

Africa’s next phase of water infrastructure development could increasingly involve a shift away from the traditional “use and discharge” model.

Rather than viewing wastewater as the end of the water cycle, industries and cities can treat it as a resource stream.

This could include blending reused water with freshwater sources, expanding greywater reuse in urban environments and developing industrial systems in which one facility’s waste stream becomes another facility’s usable input.

Mining is already providing examples of closed-loop approaches designed to reduce water costs and operational risks.

For Mistry, this represents a broader opportunity to create a circular water economy in which water, energy and other resources are recovered wherever practical.

Lesotho’s R2.4bn Senqu Bridge Opens

Scaling is the next test

The next five to ten years will therefore be less about proving that water reuse works and more about determining whether successful systems can be scaled.

Africa already has pilots, programmes and established examples. The challenge is connecting these individual successes to long-term infrastructure planning.

Mistry identifies several requirements: policy clarity, attractive investment conditions, capable core infrastructure, public inclusion and education, and standardised digital monitoring.

His three priorities for governments, utilities and industries are similarly focused on implementation: modernise and digitise water infrastructure; make water reuse a core part of water planning; and establish stable policy and investment environments that give utilities, industries and investors confidence to scale.

The most successful programmes are likely to be those that combine infrastructure investment, operational capability, digital visibility and long-term planning rather than relying on technology deployment alone.

The message is clear.Africa’s water-reuse challenge is not fundamentally a question of whether the continent possesses the necessary technology.

It is a question of whether that technology can be integrated into economically viable, reliable and scalable systems.

As water security pressures increase, the countries that make reuse part of mainstream infrastructure planning will be better positioned to turn wastewater from a disposal problem into a strategic resource.

The technology already exists. The next challenge is building the systems, policies and investment models capable of putting it to work at scale.

Also Read


Anthony Kiganda

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

MACHINERY